GeForce2 MX vs GeForce GTX 680

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4141597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.70no data
Power efficiency5.29no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGK104NV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (13 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1006 MHz175 MHz
Boost clock speed1058 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)195 Wattno data
Texture fill rate135.40.7
Floating-point processing power3.25 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs1284
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length256 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount2048 MB32 MB
Memory bus width256-bit GDDR5128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x VGA
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)no data
OpenGL4.21.2
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.175N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 680 5611
+280450%
Samples: 7423
GeForce2 MX 2
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45no data
Full HD75no data
4K25no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.65no data
4K19.96no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Fortnite 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 224 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Fortnite 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Forza Horizon 5 40−45 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 56 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30 no data
Dota 2 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130 no data
Valorant 140−150 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 no data
Far Cry 5 30−33 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 30−33 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
Metro Exodus 10−11 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Valorant 70−75 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 2048 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GTX 680 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 680 and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
GeForce GTX 680
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 648 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 680 or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.