NVS 2100M vs GeForce GTX 675MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675MX with NVS 2100M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.05
+1858%

GTX 675MX outperforms NVS 2100M by a whopping 1858% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5531279
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.832.24
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK104GT218
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96016
Core clock speed600 MHz535 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate52.324.280
Floating-point processing power1.256 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs808

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675MX 7.05
+1858%
NVS 2100M 0.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675MX 2716
+1854%
NVS 2100M 139

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 675MX 18950
+1810%
NVS 2100M 992

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Hitman 3 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Battlefield 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Hitman 3 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Hitman 3 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Hitman 3 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+2100%
2−3
−2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6 0−1
Hitman 3 3−4 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

This is how GTX 675MX and NVS 2100M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 675MX is 2350% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 675MX is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 675MX surpassed NVS 2100M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.05 0.36
Recency 1 October 2012 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 11 Watt

GTX 675MX has a 1858.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 2100M, on the other hand, has 809.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675MX is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675MX is a notebook graphics card while NVS 2100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIA NVS 2100M
NVS 2100M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 9 votes

Rate NVS 2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.