GeForce GTX 950A vs GTX 675MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 950A, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 675MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.07
+5.7%

GTX 675MX outperforms GTX 950A by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking554567
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.876.14
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGK104GM107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 2012 (12 years ago)13 March 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960640
Core clock speed600 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1124 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate52.3244.96
Floating-point processing power1.256 TFLOPS1.439 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8040

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz1001 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s32.03 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675MX 7.07
+5.7%
GTX 950A 6.69

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675MX 2716
+5.6%
GTX 950A 2572

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 675MX 10688
+3.5%
GTX 950A 10324

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Elden Ring 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Valorant 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Elden Ring 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Fortnite 40−45
+20%
35−40
−20%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Valorant 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
World of Tanks 131
+9.2%
120−130
−9.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Dota 2 24−27
+19%
21−24
−19%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+14%
50−55
−14%
Valorant 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Elden Ring 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
World of Tanks 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Valorant 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Elden Ring 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Fortnite 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

This is how GTX 675MX and GTX 950A compete in popular games:

  • GTX 675MX is 11% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.07 6.69
Recency 1 October 2012 13 March 2015
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 675MX has a 5.7% higher aggregate performance score.

GTX 950A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 675MX and GeForce GTX 950A.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GeForce GTX 675MX
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 950A

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 950A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.