FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 675MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675MX with FireStream 9270, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675MX
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
6.72
+122%

675MX outperforms FireStream 9270 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking580783
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.431.53
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK104RV770
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)13 November 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores960800
Core clock speed600 MHz750 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate52.3230.00
Floating-point processing power1.256 TFLOPS1.2 TFLOPS
ROPs3216
TMUs8040
L1 Cache80 KB160 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s115.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 675MX 6.72
+122%
FireStream 9270 3.03

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 675MX 2969
+121%
Samples: 152
FireStream 9270 1341
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+138%
21−24
−138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Fortnite 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Valorant 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 131
+138%
55−60
−138%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Dota 2 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Fortnite 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+133%
9−10
−133%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Valorant 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+158%
12−14
−158%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Dota 2 55−60
+133%
24−27
−133%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
Valorant 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+129%
24−27
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Valorant 80−85
+131%
35−40
−131%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+143%
7−8
−143%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+125%
8−9
−125%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Valorant 35−40
+131%
16−18
−131%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%

This is how GTX 675MX and FireStream 9270 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 675MX is 138% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.72 3.03
Recency 1 October 2012 13 November 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 160 Watt

GTX 675MX has a 121.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 96.4% more advanced lithography process, and 60% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675MX is our recommended choice as it beats the FireStream 9270 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675MX is a notebook graphics card while FireStream 9270 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
GeForce GTX 675MX
AMD FireStream 9270
FireStream 9270

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 46 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireStream 9270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675MX or FireStream 9270, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.