ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 675M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	627	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.46	no data
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code name	GF114	RS200
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	22 March 2012 (12 years ago)	5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2
Core clock speed	620 MHz	183 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	180 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	30 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	39.68	0.37
Floating-point processing power	0.9523 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	2
TMUs	64	2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCI Express 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	256bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	96.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	Up to 2048x1536	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

+

-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 API	7.0
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	1.4
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	22 March 2012	5 October 2002
Chip lithography	40 nm	180 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---