ATI Radeon IGP 320M vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Radeon IGP 320M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 675M SLI outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 87800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 488 | 1522 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 3.06 | no data |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Rage 7 (2001−2006) |
GPU code name | N12E-GTX2 | RS100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 6 January 2011 (13 years ago) | 5 October 2002 (22 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 2 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 160 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 160 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 30 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 2x 100 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | no data | 0.16 |
ROPs | no data | 1 |
TMUs | no data | 1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | no data | AGP 4x |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | 3000 MHz | System Shared |
Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 7.0 |
OpenGL | no data | 1.4 |
OpenCL | no data | N/A |
Vulkan | - | N/A |
CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+600%
|
3−4
−600%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+525%
|
8−9
−525%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
+625%
|
4−5
−625%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
+111%
|
27−30
−111%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+600%
|
3−4
−600%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Battlefield 5 | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+525%
|
8−9
−525%
|
Metro Exodus | 27−30 | 0−1 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
+625%
|
4−5
−625%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+178%
|
9−10
−178%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
+111%
|
27−30
−111%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24
+600%
|
3−4
−600%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+600%
|
2−3
−600%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 16−18
+325%
|
4−5
−325%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 50−55
+525%
|
8−9
−525%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 27−30
+625%
|
4−5
−625%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+178%
|
9−10
−178%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60
+111%
|
27−30
−111%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
1440p
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9 | 0−1 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 9−10 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 12−14
+100%
|
6−7
−100%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 18−20
+800%
|
2−3
−800%
|
Metro Exodus | 12−14 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60 | 0−1 |
1440p
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 14−16
+650%
|
2−3
−650%
|
4K
High Preset
Battlefield 5 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7 | 0−1 |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 30−35 | 0−1 |
Metro Exodus | 6−7 | 0−1 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 4−5 | 0−1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Far Cry 5 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6 | 0−1 |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | 0−1 |
4K
Epic Preset
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 800% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 675M SLI surpassed ATI IGP 320M in all 29 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 8.79 | 0.01 |
Recency | 6 January 2011 | 5 October 2002 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 180 nm |
GTX 675M SLI has a 87800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.