ATI Radeon IGP 320M vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI and Radeon IGP 320M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
8.79
+87800%

GTX 675M SLI outperforms ATI IGP 320M by a whopping 87800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4881522
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.06no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2RS100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682
Core clock speed620 MHz160 MHz
Boost clock speedno data160 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.16
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed3000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX117.0
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Metro Exodus 27−30 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Battlefield 5 27−30 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Metro Exodus 27−30 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 20−22 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 0−1
Hitman 3 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+525%
8−9
−525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+111%
27−30
−111%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 0−1
Hitman 3 12−14
+100%
6−7
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 675M SLI surpassed ATI IGP 320M in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.79 0.01
Recency 6 January 2011 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm

GTX 675M SLI has a 87800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon IGP 320M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
ATI Radeon IGP 320M
Radeon IGP 320M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 17 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.