ATI Radeon HD 5830 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with Radeon HD 5830, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
7.98
+93.7%

675M SLI outperforms HD 5830 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking562731
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.071.81
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2Cypress
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (15 years ago)25 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681120
Core clock speed620 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rateno data44.80
Floating-point processing powerno data1.792 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data112 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data282 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Fortnite 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
Valorant 80−85
+108%
40−45
−108%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+95.4%
65−70
−95.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Dota 2 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Fortnite 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+100%
12−14
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Valorant 80−85
+108%
40−45
−108%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+100%
8−9
−100%
Dota 2 60−65
+103%
30−33
−103%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+100%
18−20
−100%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+107%
14−16
−107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Valorant 80−85
+108%
40−45
−108%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+114%
7−8
−114%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Valorant 90−95
+100%
45−50
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.98 4.12
Recency 6 January 2011 25 February 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 175 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has a 93.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, and 8650% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5830 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon HD 5830 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
ATI Radeon HD 5830
Radeon HD 5830

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 79 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M SLI or Radeon HD 5830, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.