Quadro 5000M vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with Quadro 5000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
7.98
+62.2%

675M SLI outperforms 5000M by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking557676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.063.78
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GF100
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)27 July 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768320
Core clock speed620 MHz405 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data16.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5184 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data40
L1 Cacheno data640 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data1792 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 675M SLI 7.98
+62.2%
Quadro 5000M 4.92

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 675M SLI 18405
+137%
Quadro 5000M 7767

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Fortnite 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
Valorant 80−85
+36.1%
60−65
−36.1%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+82.6%
21−24
−82.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+47.7%
85−90
−47.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 60−65
+45.2%
40−45
−45.2%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Fortnite 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Valorant 80−85
+36.1%
60−65
−36.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+71.4%
21−24
−71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 60−65
+45.2%
40−45
−45.2%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+73.7%
18−20
−73.7%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+56.5%
21−24
−56.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+52.6%
18−20
−52.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Valorant 80−85
+36.1%
60−65
−36.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+63.3%
30−33
−63.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+63.2%
35−40
−63.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+19.4%
35−40
−19.4%
Valorant 90−95
+68.5%
50−55
−68.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+70%
10−11
−70%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Valorant 40−45
+68%
24−27
−68%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 30−33
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 675M SLI is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 675M SLI surpassed Quadro 5000M in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.98 4.92
Recency 6 January 2011 27 July 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 100 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has a 62.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and 4900% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 5000M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro 5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M SLI or Quadro 5000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.