P106-090 vs GeForce GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670M 670MX 670MX SLI 675M 675M SLI 675MX 675MX Mac Edition
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with P106-090, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
7.90
+35.3%

675M SLI outperforms P106-090 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 675M SLI GTX 675M SLI
P106-090 P106-090

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking557639
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.066.03
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)31 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed620 MHz1354 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1531 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data73.49
Floating-point processing powerno data2.352 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data288 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x1
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Fortnite 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Valorant 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+41.1%
90−95
−41.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Fortnite 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Valorant 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Dota 2 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+50%
24−27
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+50%
14−16
−50%
Valorant 80−85
+38.3%
60−65
−38.3%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+40%
35−40
−40%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Valorant 90−95
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Valorant 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Dota 2 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.90 5.84
Recency 6 January 2011 31 July 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has a 35.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 3650% lower power consumption.

P106-090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the P106-090 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook graphics card while P106-090 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA P106-090
P106-090
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
GTX 960M GeForce GTX 960M
P106-090 P106 090
vs
FireStream 9370 FireStream 9370
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
GTX 680M GeForce GTX 680M
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
P104-100 P104 100
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
P106-100 P106 100
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
P102-100 P102 100
GTX 675M SLI GeForce GTX 675M SLI
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
GTX 765M SLI GTX 765M SLI
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
vs
GT 740 OEM GT 740 OEM
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
vs
R9 M360 R9 M360

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 63 votes

Rate P106-090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 675M SLI or P106-090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.