GeForce GTX 550 Ti vs 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with GeForce GTX 550 Ti, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
8.78
+118%

675M SLI outperforms 550 Ti by a whopping 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking461654
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.390.29
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2GF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (13 years ago)15 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current price$499 $197 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 675M SLI has 724% better value for money than GTX 550 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768192
CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed620 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt116 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data100 °C
Texture fill rateno data28.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data691.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 675M SLI and GeForce GTX 550 Ti compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno data16x PCI-E 2.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data8.25" (21 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataOne 6-pin
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz4.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data98.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataTwo Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.2
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkanno dataN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M SLI 8.78
+118%
GTX 550 Ti 4.02

675M SLI outperforms 550 Ti by 118% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 675M SLI 6407
+182%
GTX 550 Ti 2272

675M SLI outperforms 550 Ti by 182% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 675M SLI 18405
+79.9%
GTX 550 Ti 10229

675M SLI outperforms 550 Ti by 80% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p80−85
+111%
38
−111%
Full HD65−70
+103%
32
−103%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hitman 3 16−18 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 20−22 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Far Cry 5 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 16−18 no data
Hitman 3 12−14 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 no data
Hitman 3 5−6 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 10−11 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10 no data

This is how GTX 675M SLI and GTX 550 Ti compete in popular games:

  • GTX 675M SLI is 111% faster in 900p
  • GTX 675M SLI is 103% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.78 4.02
Recency 6 January 2011 15 March 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 116 Watt

The GeForce GTX 675M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 550 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 550 Ti is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
GeForce GTX 550 Ti

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 59209 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 550 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.