Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
Aggregated performance score
Radeon PRO W7700 outperforms GeForce GTX 670MX SLI by 446% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 419 | 39 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | no data | 24.01 |
Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | RDNA 3.0 (2022) |
GPU code name | N13E-GR | Navi 32 |
Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 October 2012 (11 years ago) | 13 November 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Current price | no data | $999 (1x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1920 | 3072 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2600 MHz |
Number of transistors | 5080 Million | 28,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 190 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 499.2 |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 670MX SLI and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | no data |
Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | no data | 241 mm |
Width | no data | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
SLI options | + | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 16 GB |
Memory bus width | 2x 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2800 MHz | 18 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 576.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.7 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 2.2 |
Vulkan | no data | 1.3 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 71
−393%
| 350−400
+393%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−445%
|
180−190
+445%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 24−27
−438%
|
140−150
+438%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−442%
|
130−140
+442%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
−438%
|
140−150
+438%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−443%
|
190−200
+443%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
−420%
|
130−140
+420%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
−424%
|
110−120
+424%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−445%
|
180−190
+445%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 24−27
−438%
|
140−150
+438%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−442%
|
130−140
+442%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
−438%
|
140−150
+438%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−443%
|
190−200
+443%
|
Hitman 3 | 24−27
−420%
|
130−140
+420%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
Metro Exodus | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24
−424%
|
110−120
+424%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Battlefield 5 | 30−35
−445%
|
180−190
+445%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Far Cry 5 | 24−27
−442%
|
130−140
+442%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 24−27
−438%
|
140−150
+438%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
−443%
|
190−200
+443%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 16−18
−429%
|
90−95
+429%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−436%
|
75−80
+436%
|
Hitman 3 | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Metro Exodus | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
−438%
|
70−75
+438%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 9−10
−400%
|
45−50
+400%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 6−7
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
Battlefield 5 | 16−18
−431%
|
85−90
+431%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
Far Cry 5 | 14−16
−433%
|
80−85
+433%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 16−18
−431%
|
85−90
+431%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
−428%
|
95−100
+428%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 9−10
−400%
|
45−50
+400%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
Hitman 3 | 9−10
−400%
|
45−50
+400%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
Metro Exodus | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 4−5
−425%
|
21−24
+425%
|
Battlefield 5 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
Far Cry 5 | 8−9
−400%
|
40−45
+400%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 10−11
−400%
|
50−55
+400%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
−442%
|
65−70
+442%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4
−433%
|
16−18
+433%
|
This is how GTX 670MX SLI and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:
- PRO W7700 is 393% faster than GTX 670MX SLI in 1080p
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance score | 9.80 | 53.49 |
Recency | 1 October 2012 | 13 November 2023 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 190 Watt |
The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.