RTX A4000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

Place in the ranking	446	103
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.64	23.96
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N13E-GR	GA104
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 October 2012 (12 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	5120
Core clock speed	600 MHz	1140 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1680 MHz
Number of transistors	5080 Million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	268.8
Floating-point processing power	no data	17.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	80
TMUs	no data	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	8 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−294%

260−270
+294%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16
+650%

2−3

−650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −287%	120−130 +287%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −291%	90−95 +291%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −293%	110−120 +293%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −294%	260−270 +294%
Hitman 3	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −287%	120−130 +287%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −270%	100−105 +270%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +125%	27−30 −125%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −287%	120−130 +287%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −291%	90−95 +291%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −293%	110−120 +293%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −294%	260−270 +294%
Hitman 3	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −287%	120−130 +287%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −270%	100−105 +270%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +125%	27−30 −125%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −291%	90−95 +291%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −294%	260−270 +294%
Hitman 3	18−20 +375%	4−5 −375%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +575%	8−9 −575%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +700%	4−5 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +189%	9−10 −189%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 +125%	27−30 −125%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30
−270%

100−105

+270%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −295%	75−80 +295%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −267%	55−60 +267%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−12 −264%	40−45 +264%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −286%	170−180 +286%
Hitman 3	12−14 +117%	6−7 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 +900%	2−3 −900%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −293%	55−60 +293%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −285%	50−55 +285%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −287%	240−250 +287%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+700%

2−3

−700%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −289%	35−40 +289%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%
Hitman 3	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −281%	160−170 +281%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −275%	30−33 +275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −286%	27−30 +286%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −260%	18−20 +260%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −275%	45−50 +275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −250%	21−24 +250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

9−10
+350%

2−3

−350%

This is how GTX 670MX SLI and RTX A4000 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX A4000 Mobile is 294% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 670MX SLI is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, GTX 670MX SLI surpassed RTX A4000 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.04	39.79
Recency	1 October 2012	12 April 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	115 Watt

RTX A4000 Mobile has a 296.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 30.4% lower power consumption.

The RTX A4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.