P106-100 vs GeForce GTX 670MX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 670MX SLI with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 670MX SLI
2012
150 Watt
8.64

P106-100 outperforms 670MX SLI by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking515368
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.6610.15
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN13E-GRGP106
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2012 (13 years ago)19 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19201280
Core clock speed600 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors5080 Million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rateno data136.7
Floating-point processing powerno data4.375 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data80
L1 Cacheno data480 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus width2x 192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2800 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
−69%
120−130
+69%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Valorant 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
−73.5%
85−90
+73.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 168
−72.6%
290−300
+72.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Dota 2 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Fortnite 55−60
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−66.7%
30−33
+66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Valorant 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
−70.7%
70−75
+70.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Dota 2 65−70
−64.2%
110−120
+64.2%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−66.7%
50−55
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−62.5%
65−70
+62.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Valorant 90−95
−66.7%
150−160
+66.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
−69.6%
95−100
+69.6%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−69%
120−130
+69%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−50%
18−20
+50%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−73.9%
80−85
+73.9%
Valorant 100−110
−65%
170−180
+65%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−59.1%
35−40
+59.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
−50%
30−33
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 45−50
−66.7%
80−85
+66.7%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
−63.6%
18−20
+63.6%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 30−35
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%

This is how GTX 670MX SLI and P106-100 compete in popular games:

  • P106-100 is 69% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.64 15.05
Recency 1 October 2012 19 June 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

P106-100 has a 74.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 670MX SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670MX SLI is a notebook graphics card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
GeForce GTX 670MX SLI
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670MX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 327 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 670MX SLI or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.