Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP vs GeForce GTX 670M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking652not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.17no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameGF114Kalindi
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)13 August 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336128
Core clock speed598 MHz497 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million1,178 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate33.493.976
Floating-point processing power0.8037 TFLOPS0.1272 TFLOPS
ROPs244
TMUs568

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192bitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth72.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 13 August 2013
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

HD 8330 Mobile IGP has an age advantage of 1 year, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 670M and Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M
GeForce GTX 670M
AMD Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP
Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 91 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 8330 Mobile IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.