Quadro M3000 SE vs GeForce GTX 670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking425not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.08no data
Power efficiency5.79no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK104GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date10 May 2012 (13 years ago)2 October 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13441024
Core clock speed915 MHz540 MHz
Boost clock speed980 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate109.834.56
Floating-point processing power2.634 TFLOPS1.106 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs11264
L1 Cache112 KB384 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256-bit GDDR5256 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 May 2012 2 October 2016
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 75 Watt

M3000 SE has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 126.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 670 and Quadro M3000 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 670 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro M3000 SE is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
GeForce GTX 670
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE
Quadro M3000 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1255 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro M3000 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 670 or Quadro M3000 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.