GeForce 8600 GT vs GTX 660M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660M with GeForce 8600 GT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660M
2012
1 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
3.79
+1084%

GTX 660M outperforms 8600 GT by a whopping 1084% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7091311
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.230.47
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGK107G84
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 March 2012 (12 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38432
Core clock speed835 MHz540 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,270 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate30.408.640
Floating-point processing power0.7296 TFLOPS0.07616 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs3216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus width128bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.0 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 660M 3.79
+1084%
8600 GT 0.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 660M 1457
+1085%
8600 GT 123

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p32
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Full HD35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
1200p38
+1167%
3−4
−1167%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data79.50

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Elden Ring 8−9 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 5−6 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 10−12 0−1
Elden Ring 8−9 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Fortnite 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12 0−1
Metro Exodus 8−9 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 5−6 0−1
World of Tanks 89
+1171%
7−8
−1171%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 0−1
Dota 2 10−12 0−1
Far Cry 5 20−22
+1900%
1−2
−1900%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Valorant 5−6 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Elden Ring 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1
World of Tanks 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 9−10 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 0−1
Valorant 10−12 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Elden Ring 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 3−4 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Valorant 3−4 0−1

This is how GTX 660M and 8600 GT compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660M is 1500% faster in 900p
  • GTX 660M is 1650% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 660M is 1167% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.79 0.32
Recency 22 March 2012 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 47 Watt

GTX 660M has a 1084.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

8600 GT, on the other hand, has 6.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660M is a notebook card while GeForce 8600 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M
GeForce GTX 660M
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 8600 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 212 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1039 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.