Radeon R9 M370X vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M360 M365X M370X M370X Mac Edition M375 M375X M380 M380 Mac Edition M385 M385X M390 M390 Mac Edition M390X M395 M395 Mac Edition M395X M395X Mac Edition

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM with Radeon R9 M370X, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.07

R9 M370X outperforms 660 OEM by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
R9 M370X R9 M370X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking799758
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.83no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK104Cape Verde
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 August 2012 (13 years ago)19 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152640
Core clock speed823 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million1500 Million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Wattno data
Texture fill rate85.25no data
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs96no data
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (FL 11_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27−30
−25.9%
34
+25.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 103
+0%
103
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
+0%
8
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 660 OEM and R9 M370X compete in popular games:

  • R9 M370X is 26% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.07 3.72
Recency 22 August 2012 19 May 2015

R9 M370X has a 21.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

The Radeon R9 M370X is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R9 M370X is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
Radeon R9 M370X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
R9 M370X Radeon R9 M370X
vs
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
8400 GS 8400 GS
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
ATI E4690 E4690
GTX 660 660
vs
GTX 480 512 480 Core 512
GTX 660 660
vs
RTX 3090 Ti 3090 Ti
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
Data Center GPU Max 1350 Data Center GPU Max 1350
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI 9600 SE 9600 SE
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU M4 8 core GPU
GT 520 OEM GT 520 OEM
vs
Plex 7000 Plex 7000
9400 GT Rev. 3 9400 GT Rev. 3
vs
GT 520 PCI GT 520 PCI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 59 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M370X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 OEM or Radeon R9 M370X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.