Radeon HD 7670M vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM with Radeon HD 7670M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.35
+172%

GTX 660 OEM outperforms HD 7670M by a whopping 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking7001010
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.080.04
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Terascale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Thames XT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 August 2012 (11 years ago)7 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$629.99
Current price$481 $338 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 660 OEM has 100% better value for money than HD 7670M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152480
Core clock speed823 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate85.2514.40
Floating-point performance2,046 gflops576.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 660 OEM and Radeon HD 7670M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3, (GDDR5)
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5600 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p45−50
+165%
17
−165%
Full HD55−60
+162%
21
−162%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Hitman 3 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Hitman 3 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

This is how GTX 660 OEM and HD 7670M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 OEM is 165% faster in 900p
  • GTX 660 OEM is 162% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.35 1.23
Recency 22 August 2012 7 June 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 20 Watt

The GeForce GTX 660 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7670M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop card while Radeon HD 7670M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Radeon HD 7670M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 34 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 371 vote

Rate Radeon HD 7670M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.