Quadro K3100M vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1000M K1100M K2000M K2000M Embedded K2100M K2200M K3000M K3100M K4000M K4100M K5000M K5100M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM with Quadro K3100M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.08

K3100M outperforms 660 OEM by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
K3100M K3100M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking799652
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.11
Power efficiency1.835.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK104GK104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 August 2012 (13 years ago)23 July 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152768
Core clock speed823 MHz706 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate85.2545.18
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS1.084 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs9664
L1 Cache96 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s102.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18−20
−94.4%
35
+94.4%
4K8−9
−87.5%
15
+87.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data57.11
4Kno data133.27

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+0%
14
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+0%
7
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 660 OEM and K3100M compete in popular games:

  • K3100M is 94% faster in 1080p
  • K3100M is 88% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.08 5.43
Recency 22 August 2012 23 July 2013
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 75 Watt

K3100M has a 76.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K3100M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K3100M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
Quadro K3100M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
K3100M Quadro K3100M
vs
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
UHD Graphics P750 UHD Graphics P750
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
Apple M1 Max 24-Core GPU M1 Max 24-Core GPU
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
Arc A770 Arc A770
GTX 660 GTX 660
vs
Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile Arc Graphics 64EU Mobile
GTX 660 660
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 5470 HD 5470
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD 7690M Rebrand HD 7690M Rebrand
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4810 HD 4810
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
R9 FURY X2 R9 FURY X2
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
vs
RX 9070 XT RX 9070 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 139 votes

Rate Quadro K3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 OEM or Quadro K3100M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.