Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
12EU Mobile 400 405 5300 5500 5600 6000 Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM with Iris Pro Graphics 6200, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.10

Pro Graphics 6200 outperforms 660 OEM by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Iris Pro Graphics 6200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking799763
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8318.64
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Broadwell GT3e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 August 2012 (13 years ago)5 September 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152384
Core clock speed823 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate85.2552.80
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs326
TMUs9648
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.10 3.64
Recency 22 August 2012 5 September 2014
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics 6200 has a 17.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 660 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 Iris Pro Graphics 6200
vs
GeForce 940MX GeForce 940MX
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
vs
7300 GT GeForce 7300 GT
GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
vs
Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8100
GTX 660 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
vs
7800 GS 24Pipes AGP GeForce 7800 GS 24Pipes AGP
GTX 660 NVIDIA GTX 660
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6
GTX 660 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
R5 (Stoney Ridge) R5 (Stoney Ridge)
GTX 660 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI Mobility 128 M3 Mobility 128 M3
GTX 660 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
GT 730A GT 730A
GTX 660 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
9600 GTX GeForce 9600 GTX
GTX 660 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
8500 GT GeForce 8500 GT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 92 votes

Rate Iris Pro Graphics 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 OEM or Iris Pro Graphics 6200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.