ATI FirePro M5800 vs GeForce GTX 660 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
660 OEM 660 Rev. 2 660 Ti 670 680 680 Mac Edition 690 760 760 OEM 760 Ti OEM 760 X2 770
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M2000 M3900 M5950 M8900 M5800 M7820

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 660 OEM with FirePro M5800, including specs and performance data.

GTX 660 OEM
2012
2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
3.10
+142%

660 OEM outperforms M5800 by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 660 OEM GTX 660 OEM
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7991068
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.833.78
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGK104Madison
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 August 2012 (13 years ago)1 March 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152400
Core clock speed823 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed888 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt26 Watt
Texture fill rate85.2513.00
Floating-point processing power2.046 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs9620
L1 Cache96 KB40 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+138%
21
−138%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 660 OEM and ATI M5800 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 660 OEM is 138% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.10 1.28
Recency 22 August 2012 1 March 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 26 Watt

GTX 660 OEM has a 142.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI M5800, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 660 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 660 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M5800 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
ATI FirePro M5800
FirePro M5800
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI HD 4870 X2 Radeon HD 4870 X2
ATI M5800 FirePro M5800
vs
FX 3800M Quadro FX 3800M
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD 6770 Radeon HD 6770
GTX 660 GeForce GTX 660
vs
RX 6650 XT Radeon RX 6650 XT
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
K2100M Quadro K2100M
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD Graphics 5600 HD Graphics 5600
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
HD Graphics 5300 HD Graphics 5300
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
R5 M420 Radeon R5 M420
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
Vanta LT Vanta LT
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GTX 660 OEM GeForce GTX 660 OEM
vs
ATI Xpress 1200 IGP Radeon Xpress 1200 IGP
GT 520 OEM GeForce GT 520 OEM
vs
NVS 280 PCIe Quadro NVS 280 PCIe

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 660 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate FirePro M5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 660 OEM or FirePro M5800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.