Radeon R7 M275DX vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 740 OEM GTX 645 OEM GTX 650 Ti GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti OEM GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
M260 M260DX M260X M265 M265DX M270 M270DX M275DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with Radeon R7 M275DX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013, $169
2 GB GDDR5, 134 Watt
8.15
+165%

650 Ti Boost outperforms R7 M275DX by a whopping 165% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti Boost
R7 M275DX R7 M275DX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking549798
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.94no data
Power efficiency4.67no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameGK106no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 March 2013 (12 years ago)4 June 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768896
Core clock speed980 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.05no data
Floating-point processing power1.585 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs64no data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
Eyefinity-+
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-+
3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 8.15
+165%
R7 M275DX 3.08

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390
+127%
R7 M275DX 1932

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
+150%
24
−150%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.82no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 47
+0%
47
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 650 Ti Boost and R7 M275DX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 650 Ti Boost is 150% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 57 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.15 3.08
Recency 26 March 2013 4 June 2014

GTX 650 Ti Boost has a 164.6% higher aggregate performance score.

R7 M275DX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R7 M275DX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 M275DX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
Radeon R7 M275DX
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 590 GeForce GTX 590
R7 M275DX Radeon R7 M275DX
vs
GTX 560M GeForce GTX 560M
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
GTX 680 Mac Edition NVIDIA GTX 680 Mac Edition
vs
GTX 680MX Mac Edition 680MX Mac Edition
GTX 680 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
vs
R9 M290X Mac Edition R9 M290X Mac Edition
GTX 680 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell PRO 4000 Blackwell
GTX 680 Mac Edition NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
vs
RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell
GTX 650 Ti OEM NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti OEM
vs
RTX 6000 Ada Generation RTX 6000 Ada Generation
GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
9800 GT GeForce 9800 GT
GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
R8 M535DX R8 M535DX
GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GT 1030 GK107 GT 1030 GK107
GTX 650 Ti Boost NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
GTX TITAN NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
vs
GeForce 930M GeForce 930M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 453 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R7 M275DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost or Radeon R7 M275DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.