Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 740 OEM GTX 645 OEM GTX 650 Ti GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti OEM GTX 660 GTX 750 Ti OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 134 Watt
7.70
+33.7%

650 Ti Boost outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti Boost
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551626
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.77no data
Power efficiency4.6423.25
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)no data
GPU code nameGK106no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 March 2013 (12 years ago)3 September 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768768
Core clock speed980 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1033 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt20 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.05no data
Floating-point processing power1.585 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs64no data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache384 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6.0 GB/s8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth144.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 Displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 7.70
+33.7%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 5.76

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 650 Ti Boost 4390
+17.8%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 3728

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
+20%
20
−20%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.04no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+0%
24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 650 Ti Boost and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • GTX 650 Ti Boost is 20% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 61 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.70 5.76
Recency 26 March 2013 3 September 2024
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 20 Watt

GTX 650 Ti Boost has a 33.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 570% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost is a desktop graphics card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 590 GeForce GTX 590
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
GTX 650 Ti Boost GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
GTX 645 OEM GTX 645 OEM
vs
RTX A4000 RTX A4000
GTX 645 OEM GTX 645 OEM
vs
RTX A400 RTX A400
GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
HD 8450 OEM HD 8450 OEM
GTX 650 Ti Boost GTX 650 Ti Boost
vs
HD 7970 X2 HD 7970 X2
GTX 650 Ti Boost 650 Ti Boost
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Mobile 3 GB
GTX TITAN GTX TITAN
vs
R5 220 OEM R5 220 OEM
GTX TITAN TITAN
vs
RTX 4010 4010
GT 625 OEM GT 625 OEM
vs
HD 6850 1440SP Edition HD 6850 1440SP Edition
GT 625 OEM GT 625 OEM
vs
HD 6490M Mac Edition HD 6490M Mac Edition
505 OEM 505 OEM
vs
RX 7600S RX 7600S

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 450 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost or Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.