Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 645 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated407
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGK106Navi 14
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 April 2013 (12 years ago)13 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5761280
Core clock speed824 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate39.55100.0
Floating-point processing power0.9492 TFLOPS3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs4880
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length147 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 April 2013 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 85 Watt

GTX 645 OEM has 30.8% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 645 OEM and Radeon Pro 5300M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 645 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 645 OEM
GeForce GTX 645 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon Pro 5300M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 135 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 645 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 190 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 645 OEM or Radeon Pro 5300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.