Radeon RX 490M vs GeForce GTX 590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking564not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.68no data
Power efficiency1.69no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameGF110Polaris
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date24 March 2011 (15 years ago)1 August 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024 ×2no data
Core clock speed607 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate38.91 ×2no data
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs48 ×2no data
TMUs64 ×2no data
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) ×2no data
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2no data
Memory clock speed1707 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth327.7 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 March 2011 1 August 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm

RX 490M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 590 and Radeon RX 490M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 590 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 490M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 61 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 8 votes

Rate Radeon RX 490M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 590 or Radeon RX 490M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.