ATI Radeon 7000 vs GeForce GTX 590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5551601
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.68no data
Power efficiency1.68no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGF110RV100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 March 2011 (14 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024 ×2no data
Core clock speed607 MHz183 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)365 Watt23 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate38.91 ×20.55
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs48 ×21
TMUs64 ×23
L1 Cache1 MBno data
L2 Cache768 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length279 mmno data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) ×232 MB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed1707 MHz183 MHz
Memory bandwidth327.7 GB/s ×22.928 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.21.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 590 3341
+166950%
Samples: 419
ATI 7000 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p47no data
Full HD111no data
1200p112no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Escape from Tarkov 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 40−45 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Escape from Tarkov 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Fortnite 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Forza Horizon 5 24−27 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 no data
Dota 2 60−65 no data
Escape from Tarkov 30−35 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 no data
Valorant 80−85 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 no data
Metro Exodus 8−9 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 no data
Valorant 90−95 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Escape from Tarkov 14−16 no data
Far Cry 5 16−18 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 16−18 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 no data
Metro Exodus 3−4 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 no data
Valorant 40−45 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10 no data
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Dota 2 30−33 no data
Escape from Tarkov 7−8 no data
Far Cry 5 8−9 no data
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 8−9 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 March 2011 19 February 2001
Maximum RAM amount 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU) 32 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 365 Watt 23 Watt

GTX 590 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 7000, on the other hand, has 1487% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 590 and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 59 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 200 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 590 or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.