Mobility Radeon X2300 vs GeForce GTX 590

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	460	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.47	no data
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code name	GF110	M64
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	24 March 2011 (13 years ago)	1 March 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data
Current price	$600 (0.9x MSRP)	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	6
CUDA cores	1024	no data
Core clock speed	607 MHz	2 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	480 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	365 Watt	no data
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.7 billion/sec	1.916
Floating-point performance	2x 1,244.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 590 and Mobility Radeon X2300 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 1.0 x16
Length	11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	Two 8-pin	no data
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR1/DDR2/GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)	256 MB
Memory bus width	768-bit (384-bit per GPU)	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1707 MHz	892 MHz
Memory bandwidth	327.7 GB/s	6.272 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Three Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	no data
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model	5.1	3.0
OpenGL	4.2	2.0
OpenCL	1.1	N/A
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	24 March 2011	1 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount	3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)	256 MB
Chip lithography	40 nm	90 nm

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---