GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER vs GTX 580M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580M with GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580M
2011
2 MB GDDR5, 100 Watt
5.37

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms GTX 580M by a whopping 1544% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5784
Place by popularitynot in top-10074
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.5221.28
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2AD103-400-A1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 June 2011 (13 years ago)31 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999
Current price$170 $1202 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4080 SUPER has 744% better value for money than GTX 580M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38410240
CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed620 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2550 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate39.7 billion/sec816.0
Floating-point performance952.3 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 580M and GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz23000 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.0 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580M 5.37
RTX 4080 SUPER 88.26
+1544%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms GTX 580M by 1544% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 580M 2074
RTX 4080 SUPER 34082
+1543%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms GTX 580M by 1543% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 580M 3117
RTX 4080 SUPER 87055
+2693%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms GTX 580M by 2693% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 580M 14404
RTX 4080 SUPER 141652
+883%

RTX 4080 SUPER outperforms GTX 580M by 883% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p42
−1448%
650−700
+1448%
Full HD55
−362%
254
+362%
1200p42
−1448%
650−700
+1448%
1440p10−12
−1690%
179
+1690%
4K7−8
−1571%
117
+1571%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−2036%
235
+2036%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−5520%
281
+5520%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1643%
240−250
+1643%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−991%
120−130
+991%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−1240%
200−210
+1240%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1276%
344
+1276%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1130%
120−130
+1130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1763%
503
+1763%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−1273%
150−160
+1273%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−786%
120−130
+786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−3311%
614
+3311%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−552%
150−160
+552%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−1827%
212
+1827%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−4640%
237
+4640%
Battlefield 5 14−16
−1643%
240−250
+1643%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−991%
120−130
+991%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−1240%
200−210
+1240%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−980%
270−280
+980%
Hitman 3 10−11
−1130%
120−130
+1130%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1274%
350−400
+1274%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−764%
95
+764%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−786%
120−130
+786%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−3056%
568
+3056%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−4458%
547
+4458%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−552%
150−160
+552%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−1336%
158
+1336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−4080%
209
+4080%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−991%
120−130
+991%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−1456%
140−150
+1456%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−883%
110−120
+883%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−1188%
322
+1188%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−1474%
425
+1474%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
−2828%
527
+2828%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−2092%
263
+2092%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−530%
145
+530%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−786%
120−130
+786%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
−1560%
160−170
+1560%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−1957%
140−150
+1957%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−2600%
135
+2600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1500%
110−120
+1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1400%
30−33
+1400%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−2563%
213
+2563%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−3300%
306
+3300%
Hitman 3 9−10
−1333%
120−130
+1333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−2775%
345
+2775%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−5600%
171
+5600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−5425%
221
+5425%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−6250%
127
+6250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−1190%
120−130
+1190%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−2100%
85−90
+2100%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−1625%
65−70
+1625%
Hitman 3 2−3
−4050%
80−85
+4050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−3280%
169
+3280%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−6650%
135
+6650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−20300%
204
+20300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−3100%
96
+3100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2500%
50−55
+2500%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6000%
305
+6000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−4020%
206
+4020%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−1929%
142
+1929%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1750%
110−120
+1750%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−1550%
165
+1550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1554%
397
+1554%

This is how GTX 580M and RTX 4080 SUPER compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 1448% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 362% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 1448% faster in 1200p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 1690% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 SUPER is 1571% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4080 SUPER is 20300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4080 SUPER surpassed GTX 580M in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.37 88.26
Recency 28 June 2011 31 January 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 320 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580M
GeForce GTX 580M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 19 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 968 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.