Radeon RX 7900 XT vs GeForce GTX 580

Place in the ranking	404	12
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.99	44.01
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	RDNA 3 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GF110	Navi 31 XT
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	9 November 2010 (13 years ago)	3 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7900 XT has 2112% better value for money than GTX 580.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	5376
CUDA cores	512	no data
Core clock speed	772 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	315 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	49.41	804.4
Floating-point processing power	1.581 gflops	51.48 gflops
ROPs	48	192
TMUs	64	336

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	276 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	2x 8-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	20 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	320 Bit
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz (4008 data rate)	20000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.4 GB/s	800.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI	1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580 11.87

RX 7900 XT 74.39
+527%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 580 4579

RX 7900 XT 28689
+527%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 580 21941

RX 7900 XT 142489
+549%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 580 6065

RX 7900 XT 75896
+1151%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 580 4970

RX 7900 XT 63712
+1182%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 580 14950

RX 7900 XT 185275
+1139%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	53 −466%	300−350 +466%
Full HD	98 −113%	209 +113%
1200p	78 −477%	450−500 +477%
1440p	21−24 −571%	141 +571%
4K	12−14 −625%	87 +625%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

18−20

−1217%

237
+1217%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −446%	150−160 +446%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −650%	130−140 +650%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −532%	240−250 +532%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −1078%	212 +1078%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −321%	110−120 +321%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −461%	180−190 +461%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −213%	240−250 +213%
Hitman 3	21−24 −486%	120−130 +486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −325%	260−270 +325%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −297%	150−160 +297%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −273%	120−130 +273%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −742%	300−350 +742%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −122%	150−160 +122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −446%	150−160 +446%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −650%	130−140 +650%
Battlefield 5	35−40 −532%	240−250 +532%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −956%	190 +956%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −321%	110−120 +321%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 −461%	180−190 +461%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −213%	240−250 +213%
Hitman 3	21−24 −486%	120−130 +486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −325%	260−270 +325%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −297%	150−160 +297%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −273%	120−130 +273%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −1195%	492 +1195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −440%	160−170 +440%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −122%	150−160 +122%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −446%	150−160 +446%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −650%	130−140 +650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −400%	120−130 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −894%	179 +894%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −321%	110−120 +321%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 −213%	240−250 +213%
Hitman 3	21−24 −486%	120−130 +486%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 −456%	350 +456%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −1016%	424 +1016%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −783%	265 +783%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −122%	150−160 +122%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35

−273%

120−130
+273%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −622%	160−170 +622%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −522%	110−120 +522%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −642%	85−90 +642%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −1113%	95−100 +1113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −583%	80−85 +583%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −1933%	122 +1933%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −500%	80−85 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −375%	270−280 +375%
Hitman 3	14−16 −627%	100−110 +627%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −1054%	277 +1054%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −642%	141 +642%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20 −1706%	325 +1706%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1050%	130−140 +1050%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −224%	240−250 +224%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−532%

120−130
+532%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −700%	85−90 +700%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 −667%	65−70 +667%
Hitman 3	8−9 −738%	65−70 +738%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −311%	220−230 +311%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −1120%	120−130 +1120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −1490%	159 +1490%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −800%	60−65 +800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1120%	60−65 +1120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −767%	50−55 +767%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2900%	60 +2900%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −733%	50−55 +733%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −807%	130−140 +807%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −1630%	173 +1630%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −1150%	50−55 +1150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12

−664%

80−85
+664%

This is how GTX 580 and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 7900 XT is 466% faster in 900p
RX 7900 XT is 113% faster in 1080p
RX 7900 XT is 477% faster in 1200p
RX 7900 XT is 571% faster in 1440p
RX 7900 XT is 625% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900 XT is 2900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 7900 XT surpassed GTX 580 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.87	74.39
Recency	9 November 2010	3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	20 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	315 Watt

GTX 580 has 29.1% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 526.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.