Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition vs GeForce GTX 580
Aggregated performance score
Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition outperforms GeForce GTX 580 by 13% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 375 | 355 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 8.17 | no data |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2017) |
GPU code name | GF110 | Amethyst |
Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Release date | 9 November 2010 (13 years ago) | 23 November 2014 (9 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | no data |
Current price | $14.89 (0x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed Specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 512 | 2048 |
CUDA cores | 512 | no data |
Core clock speed | 772 MHz | 850 MHz |
Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 5,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 250 Watt |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
Texture fill rate | 49.4 billion/sec | 108.8 |
Floating-point performance | 1,581.1 gflops | 3,482 gflops |
Form Factor & Compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | no data |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | no data |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
Width | 2-slot | MXM Module |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin and One 8-pin | no data |
SLI options | + | no data |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2004 MHz (4008 data rate) | 5448 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 192.4 GB/s | 174.3 GB/s |
Connectivity and Outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | No outputs |
Multi monitor support | + | no data |
HDMI | + | no data |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
API Compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | + | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
900p | 53
−13.2%
| 60−65
+13.2%
|
Full HD | 98
−12.2%
| 110−120
+12.2%
|
1200p | 78
−9%
| 85−90
+9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−12.5%
|
45−50
+12.5%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
−12.9%
|
35−40
+12.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
−9.4%
|
35−40
+9.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−7.1%
|
45−50
+7.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 30−35
−12.9%
|
35−40
+12.9%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
−12.5%
|
27−30
+12.5%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−12.5%
|
45−50
+12.5%
|
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 30−35
−12.9%
|
35−40
+12.9%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
−9.4%
|
35−40
+9.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−7.1%
|
45−50
+7.1%
|
Hitman 3 | 30−35
−12.9%
|
35−40
+12.9%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 24−27
−12.5%
|
27−30
+12.5%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−12.5%
|
27−30
+12.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 24−27
−8%
|
27−30
+8%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−12.5%
|
45−50
+12.5%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35
−9.4%
|
35−40
+9.4%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−7.1%
|
45−50
+7.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−12.5%
|
27−30
+12.5%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
Hitman 3 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−5.9%
|
18−20
+5.9%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Battlefield 5 | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 18−20
−10.5%
|
21−24
+10.5%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−9.1%
|
24−27
+9.1%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 8−9
−12.5%
|
9−10
+12.5%
|
Hitman 3 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Horizon Zero Dawn | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Battlefield 5 | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12−14
+9.1%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−11.1%
|
10−11
+11.1%
|
Far Cry New Dawn | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−6.7%
|
16−18
+6.7%
|
Watch Dogs: Legion | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
This is how GTX 580 and R9 M295X Mac Edition compete in popular games:
- R9 M295X Mac Edition is 13.2% faster than GTX 580 in 900p
- R9 M295X Mac Edition is 12.2% faster than GTX 580 in 1080p
- R9 M295X Mac Edition is 9% faster than GTX 580 in 1200p
Pros & Cons Summary
Performance score | 11.80 | 13.38 |
Recency | 9 November 2010 | 23 November 2014 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 4 GB |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 244 Watt | 250 Watt |
The Radeon R9 M295X Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with Similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.