GeForce GTX 560M SLI vs 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580 with GeForce GTX 560M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 244 Watt
11.82
+85%

580 outperforms 560M SLI by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking378543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.174.15
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGF110N12E-GS
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 November 2010 (13 years ago)6 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data
Current price$14.89 (0x MSRP)$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 580 has 97% better value for money than GTX 560M SLI.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512384
CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed772 MHz775 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)244 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate49.4 billion/secno data
Floating-point performance1,581.1 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 580 and GeForce GTX 560M SLI compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsOne 6-pin and One 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MBno data
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz (4008 data rate)1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
Vulkan+no data
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580 11.82
+85%
GTX 560M SLI 6.39

580 outperforms 560M SLI by 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 580 6065
+67.7%
GTX 560M SLI 3616

580 outperforms 560M SLI by 68% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 580 21941
+25.5%
GTX 560M SLI 17484

580 outperforms 560M SLI by 25% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53
+96.3%
27−30
−96.3%
Full HD96
+92%
50−55
−92%
1200p78
+95%
40−45
−95%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Hitman 3 21−24 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 35−40 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 18−20 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hitman 3 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10 no data
Hitman 3 8−9 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12 no data

This is how GTX 580 and GTX 560M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 580 is 96% faster in 900p
  • GTX 580 is 92% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 580 is 95% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.82 6.39
Recency 9 November 2010 6 January 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 244 Watt 100 Watt

The GeForce GTX 580 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI
GeForce GTX 560M SLI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 443 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.