GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs GTX 580

Place in the ranking	409	240
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.06	no data
Power efficiency	3.39	13.57
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GF110	GP106
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	9 November 2010 (14 years ago)	26 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1280
Core clock speed	772 MHz	1506 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1709 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	49.41	136.7
Floating-point processing power	1.581 TFLOPS	4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	40
TMUs	64	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	PCI-E 2.0 x 16	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	250 mm
Height	4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	5 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz (4008 data rate)	2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.4 GB/s	160.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.2	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 580 11.99

GTX 1060 5 GB 23.61
+96.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 580 4611

GTX 1060 5 GB 9075
+96.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	54 −85.2%	100−110 +85.2%
Full HD	95 −89.5%	180−190 +89.5%
1200p	78 −92.3%	150−160 +92.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

5.25

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Elden Ring	35−40 −85.7%	65−70 +85.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
Valorant	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Dota 2	40−45 −86%	80−85 +86%
Elden Ring	35−40 −85.7%	65−70 +85.7%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Fortnite	65−70 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −86%	80−85 +86%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −81.8%	60−65 +81.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 −88.9%	170−180 +88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −93.5%	60−65 +93.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −94.4%	70−75 +94.4%
Valorant	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
World of Tanks	160−170 −81.8%	300−310 +81.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −92.3%	75−80 +92.3%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −90.5%	40−45 +90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −95.7%	45−50 +95.7%
Dota 2	40−45 −86%	80−85 +86%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −87.5%	90−95 +87.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 −88.9%	170−180 +88.9%
Valorant	45−50 −91.5%	90−95 +91.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Elden Ring	18−20 −94.4%	35−40 +94.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −88.4%	130−140 +88.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −80%	18−20 +80%
World of Tanks	85−90 −88.2%	160−170 +88.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −87.5%	45−50 +87.5%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −96.4%	55−60 +96.4%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Valorant	30−33 −83.3%	55−60 +83.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Dota 2	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Elden Ring	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 −85.7%	65−70 +85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −75%	14−16 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −71.4%	12−14 +71.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Dota 2	21−24 −81.8%	40−45 +81.8%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −80%	27−30 +80%
Fortnite	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Valorant	12−14 −75%	21−24 +75%

This is how GTX 580 and GTX 1060 5 GB compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 5 GB is 85% faster in 900p
GTX 1060 5 GB is 89% faster in 1080p
GTX 1060 5 GB is 92% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.99	23.61
Recency	9 November 2010	26 December 2017
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	5 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	244 Watt	120 Watt

GTX 1060 5 GB has a 96.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 103.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 580 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.