CMP 30HX vs GeForce GTX 580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CMP 30HX CMP 40HX CMP 50HX RTX 4000 RTX 5000 RTX 6000 T1000 T400 T400 4 GB T600 T1000 Tesla T4

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 580 with CMP 30HX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 580
2010
1536 MB GDDR5, 244 Watt
10.48

CMP 30HX outperforms 580 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 580 GTX 580
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking453440
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.754.27
Power efficiency3.467.18
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGF110TU116
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date9 November 2010 (14 years ago)25 February 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

CMP 30HX has 144% better value for money than GTX 580.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121408
Core clock speed772 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)244 Watt125 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate49.41157.1
Floating-point processing power1.581 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs4848
TMUs6488
L1 Cache1 MB1.4 MB
L2 Cache768 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x4
Length267 mm229 mm
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB6 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed2004 MHz (4008 data rate)1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.4 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 580 10.48
CMP 30HX 11.14
+6.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 580 4636
Samples: 4720
CMP 30HX 4927
+6.3%
Samples: 15

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 580 15190
CMP 30HX 65068
+328%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p53
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
Full HD99
−1%
100−110
+1%
1200p78
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.04
+58.5%
7.99
−58.5%
  • GTX 580 has 59% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Fortnite 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Valorant 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−4.8%
65−70
+4.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
−4.3%
170−180
+4.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Dota 2 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Fortnite 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+5%
40−45
−5%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Valorant 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Dota 2 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Valorant 100−110
+2%
100−105
−2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
−6.1%
70−75
+6.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 85−90
−5.9%
90−95
+5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
−3.9%
80−85
+3.9%
Valorant 120−130
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

This is how GTX 580 and CMP 30HX compete in popular games:

  • CMP 30HX is 4% faster in 900p
  • CMP 30HX is 1% faster in 1080p
  • CMP 30HX is 3% faster in 1200p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.48 11.14
Recency 9 November 2010 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 244 Watt 125 Watt

CMP 30HX has a 6.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 95.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 580 and CMP 30HX.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 580 is a desktop graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
GeForce GTX 580
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 580 GeForce GTX 580
vs
HD 7870 Radeon HD 7870
CMP 30HX CMP 30HX
vs
FirePro S9050 FirePro S9050
GTX 580 GeForce GTX 580
vs
R9 370 Radeon R9 370
HD 7500G HD 7500G
vs
HD 7870 HD 7870
Pro WX 4130 Pro WX 4130
vs
HD 7870 HD 7870
RX 560X RX 560X
vs
HD 7870 HD 7870
GT 720M GT 720M
vs
GTX 1050 GTX 1050
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
vs
GTX 1050 GTX 1050
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB
vs
GTX 580 GTX 580
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti
Steam Deck GPU Steam Deck GPU
vs
GTX 560 Ti GTX 560 Ti
RTX 4050 Mobile 4050 Mobile
vs
GTX 560 Ti 560 Ti
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
vs
FirePro W2100 W2100

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 497 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 38 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 580 or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.