Radeon R9 M390 vs GeForce GTX 570
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 570 with Radeon R9 M390, including specs and performance data.
GTX 570 outperforms R9 M390 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 457 | 476 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.10 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.18 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN (2012−2015) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Pitcairn |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 7 December 2010 (14 years ago) | 9 June 2015 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 480 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | 5000 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 219 Watt | no data |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 43.92 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.405 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 40 | no data |
| TMUs | 60 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1900 MHz (3800 data rate) | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | no data |
| Multi monitor support | + | no data |
| Eyefinity | - | + |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| FreeSync | - | + |
| HD3D | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| DualGraphics | - | + |
| ZeroCore | - | + |
| Switchable graphics | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
| Mantle | - | + |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 80
+86%
| 43
−86%
|
| 4K | 21−24
+5%
| 20
−5%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 4.36 | no data |
| 4K | 16.62 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - Full HD
Epic Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+8.5%
|
45−50
−8.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+8.5%
|
45−50
−8.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+6.9%
|
27−30
−6.9%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+6.3%
|
30−35
−6.3%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+3.4%
|
85−90
−3.4%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+8.5%
|
45−50
−8.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+4.3%
|
130−140
−4.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+4.5%
|
65−70
−4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+6.9%
|
27−30
−6.9%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+7.4%
|
27−30
−7.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+5.9%
|
34
−5.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+6.3%
|
30−35
−6.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−24%
|
31
+24%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+3.4%
|
85−90
−3.4%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 20−22
+11.1%
|
18−20
−11.1%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
+4.5%
|
65−70
−4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+6.9%
|
27−30
−6.9%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+5%
|
40−45
−5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+6.3%
|
30−35
−6.3%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+38.9%
|
18
−38.9%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+3.4%
|
85−90
−3.4%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+5.6%
|
50−55
−5.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+5.8%
|
65−70
−5.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 45−50
+4.4%
|
45−50
−4.4%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+5%
|
100−110
−5%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+9.5%
|
21−24
−9.5%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+7.7%
|
12−14
−7.7%
|
| Fortnite | 20−22
+5.3%
|
18−20
−5.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−9.1%
|
12
+9.1%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+6.4%
|
45−50
−6.4%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 35−40
+6.1%
|
30−35
−6.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+6.7%
|
14−16
−6.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
This is how GTX 570 and R9 M390 compete in popular games:
- GTX 570 is 86% faster in 1080p
- GTX 570 is 5% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 570 is 50% faster.
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the R9 M390 is 24% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 570 is ahead in 56 tests (85%)
- R9 M390 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)
- there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.84 | 9.32 |
| Recency | 7 December 2010 | 9 June 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | 2 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
GTX 570 has a 5.6% higher aggregate performance score.
R9 M390, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 570 and Radeon R9 M390.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 570 is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M390 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
