Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5830 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
Price now
1198$
Games supported
59%
- Interface MXM-B (3.0)
- Core clock speed 775
- Max video memory 1536 MB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 1250 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 500
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type DDR3, GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 800
- Maximum resolution
Price now
no data
Games supported
55%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 656 | 904 |
| Value for money | 0.09 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
| GPU code name | N12E-GS | Broadway |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 May 2011 (11 years old) | 7 January 2010 (13 years old) |
| Current price | $1198 | no data |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 800 |
| CUDA cores | 192 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 1,040 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 24 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.8 billion/sec | 20.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on GeForce GTX 560M and Mobility Radeon HD 5830 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | large | large |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
| SLI options | 2-way | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | Up to 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | Up to 60 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Blu-Ray | + | no data |
| 3D Gaming | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | no data |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- 3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce GTX 560M outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5830 by 94% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 560M and Mobility Radeon HD 5830. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 44 Mh/s | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 31 | no data |
| Full HD | 39 | no data |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4 | no data |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14
+30%
|
10−11
−30%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| Hitman 3 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 3−4 | no data |
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
+42.9%
|
7−8
−42.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 5−6
+400%
|
1−2
−400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+350%
|
2−3
−350%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
+75%
|
4−5
−75%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 3−4 | no data |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Hitman 3 | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
+50%
|
4−5
−50%
|
| Metro Exodus | 4−5
+33.3%
|
3−4
−33.3%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+66.7%
|
3−4
−66.7%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | no data |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Hitman 3 | 3−4
+50%
|
2−3
−50%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 0−1 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | no data |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | no data |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 3.07 | 1.37 |
| Recency | 30 May 2011 | 7 January 2010 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 800 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 24 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of GeForce GTX 560M by AMD
According to our data, the closest equivalent to GeForce GTX 560M by AMD is Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2, which is slower by 1% and lower by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 560M:
Competitors of Mobility Radeon HD 5830 by NVIDIA
The nearest Mobility Radeon HD 5830's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce GT 630M, which is faster by 1% and higher by 6 positions in our performance rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Mobility Radeon HD 5830:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
