GTS 450 vs GTX 560M

#ad
Buy
SLI
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 560M
3.20

GTS 450 outperforms GTX 560M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking703688
Place by popularitynot in top-10097
Value for money0.110.31
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameN12E-GSGF106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 May 2011 (12 years old)13 September 2010 (13 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129
Current price$1198 $127 (1x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTS 450 has 182% better value for money than GTX 560M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192192
CUDA cores192192
Core clock speed775 MHz783 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt106 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data100 °C
Texture fill rate24.8 billion/sec25.1 billion/sec
Floating-point performance595.2 gflops601.3 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560M and GeForce GTS 450 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0PCI-E 2.0 x 16
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone6-pin
SLI options2-way+

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus widthUp to 192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1804 (3608 data rate) MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 60 GB/s57.7 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI
HDMIno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.2
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560M 3.20
GTS 450 3.41
+6.6%

GTS 450 outperforms GTX 560M by 7% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560M 1241
GTS 450 1322
+6.5%

GTS 450 outperforms GTX 560M by 7% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 560M 9300
GTS 450 9758
+4.9%

GTS 450 outperforms GTX 560M by 5% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 560M 1820
GTS 450 1888
+3.7%

GTS 450 outperforms GTX 560M by 4% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 560M 1380
GTS 450 1545
+12%

GTS 450 outperforms GTX 560M by 12% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 560M 4702
GTS 450 4931
+4.9%

GTS 450 outperforms GTX 560M by 5% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 560M 15
GTS 450 15

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p31
+10.7%
28
−10.7%
Full HD39
+2.6%
38
−2.6%
1200p24−27
−12.5%
27
+12.5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Hitman 3 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

This is how GTX 560M and GTS 450 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

  • GTX 560M is 10.7% faster than GTS 450

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 560M is 2.6% faster than GTS 450

1200p resolution:

  • GTS 450 is 12.5% faster than GTX 560M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTS 450 is 100% faster than the GTX 560M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTS 450 is ahead in 24 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (58%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.20 3.41
Recency 30 May 2011 13 September 2010
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 106 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560M and GeForce GTS 450. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M is a notebook card while GeForce GTS 450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
GeForce GTX 560M
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GeForce GTS 450

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 78 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 2385 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.