UHD Graphics 770 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 560M SLI with UHD Graphics 770, including specs and performance data.
560M SLI outperforms Graphics 770 by a small 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 632 | 641 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.61 | 28.98 |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | N12E-GS | Raptor Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 6 January 2011 (14 years ago) | 27 September 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1650 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 26.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.8448 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 18−20
+0%
| 18
+0%
|
| 4K | 12−14
−8.3%
| 13
+8.3%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
−73.3%
|
52
+73.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+9.1%
|
11
−9.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+9.1%
|
11
−9.1%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
−13.3%
|
34
+13.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+20%
|
10
−20%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+11.8%
|
17
−11.8%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+5.7%
|
35−40
−5.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+7.7%
|
24−27
−7.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+3%
|
65−70
−3%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−33
+233%
|
9
−233%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
+5.2%
|
95−100
−5.2%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+14%
|
43
−14%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16
−18.8%
|
| Fortnite | 35−40
+5.7%
|
35−40
−5.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+7.7%
|
24−27
−7.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 18−20
+12.5%
|
16
−12.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+133%
|
9
−133%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+140%
|
5
−140%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
−12.5%
|
18
+12.5%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+3%
|
65−70
−3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27
+8.3%
|
24−27
−8.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 45−50
+22.5%
|
40
−22.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+35.7%
|
14
−35.7%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+7.7%
|
24−27
−7.7%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+4.5%
|
21−24
−4.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 16−18
+77.8%
|
9
−77.8%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+3%
|
65−70
−3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+5.7%
|
35−40
−5.7%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 45−50
+6.8%
|
40−45
−6.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6−7
+20%
|
5−6
−20%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Valorant | 65−70
+6.3%
|
60−65
−6.3%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 10−11
+25%
|
8−9
−25%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+25%
|
4−5
−25%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 12−14
+9.1%
|
10−12
−9.1%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
+6.9%
|
27−30
−6.9%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14
−57.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 9−10
+12.5%
|
8−9
−12.5%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
This is how GTX 560M SLI and UHD Graphics 770 compete in popular games:
- A tie in 1080p
- UHD Graphics 770 is 8% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 560M SLI is 233% faster.
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics 770 is 73% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- GTX 560M SLI performs better in 44 tests (70%)
- UHD Graphics 770 performs better in 3 tests (5%)
- there's a draw in 16 tests (25%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.95 | 5.61 |
| Recency | 6 January 2011 | 27 September 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 15 Watt |
GTX 560M SLI has a 6.1% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 560M SLI and UHD Graphics 770.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
