RTX PRO 6000 vs GeForce GTX 560M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560M 560M SLI 570M 580M 580M SLI 780M 850M 860M 950M 960M 970M 980M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5000 72 GB Blackwell 5000 Blackwell 6000 6000 Blackwell 6000 Blackwell Max-Q 6000 Blackwell Server 6000D Blackwell 6000D Blackwell Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560M SLI with RTX PRO 6000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560M SLI
2011
100 Watt
6.04

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms 560M SLI by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 560M SLI GTX 560M SLI
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking636610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.640.84
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameN12E-GSGB202
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38424064
Core clock speed775 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistorsno data92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,810
Floating-point processing powerno data115.8 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amountno data96 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-10.1
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Fortnite 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Valorant 65−70
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+1%
100−105
−1%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Fortnite 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−7.1%
30−33
+7.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 65−70
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
−8.1%
40−45
+8.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Valorant 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 6.04 6.57
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 600 Watt

GTX 560M SLI has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 8.8% higher aggregate performance score, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 560M SLI and RTX PRO 6000.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560M SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI
GeForce GTX 560M SLI
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560M SLI GeForce GTX 560M SLI
vs
GTX 950M GeForce GTX 950M
RTX PRO 6000 RTX PRO 6000
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
GTX 560M SLI GeForce GTX 560M SLI
vs
GTX 950A GeForce GTX 950A
HD 6870 AMD HD 6870
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU 16EU
GTX 470 NVIDIA GTX 470
vs
HD 8670M 8670M
GTX 470 NVIDIA GTX 470
vs
UHD Graphics 610 610
GTX 480M SLI GeForce GTX 480M SLI
vs
GTX 950M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 950M Mac Edition
GTX 480M SLI NVIDIA GTX 480M SLI
vs
RTX PRO 6000 6000
GTX 560M SLI NVIDIA GTX 560M SLI
vs
RTX PRO 5000 72 GB Blackwell 5000 72 GB Blackwell
GTX 560M SLI NVIDIA GTX 560M SLI
vs
RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell 6000D Blackwell
ATI HD 5850 ATI HD 5850
vs
ATI X550 HyperMemory X550 HyperMemory
ATI HD 5850 ATI HD 5850
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 500 Ada Generation Mobile
HD 6990M AMD HD 6990M
vs
GT 730A 730A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 560M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 69 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560M SLI or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.