Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 560

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking605not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
Power efficiency3.39no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF114Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 May 2011 (14 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3363584 ×2
Core clock speed810 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt230 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature99 °Cno data
Texture fill rate45.36224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.089 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs3264 ×2
TMUs56224 ×2
L1 Cache448 KB896 KB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width256 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1000 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 May 2011 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 230 Watt

GTX 560 has 53.3% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 560 and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1151 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.