Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 555 OEM

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGF114Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 May 2011 (14 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2883584 ×2
Core clock speed736 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate35.33224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.8479 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs2464 ×2
TMUs48224 ×2
L1 Cache384 KB896 KB
L2 Cache384 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length210 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width192 Bit2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed957 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth91.87 GB/s483.8 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.125
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2011 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 230 Watt

GTX 555 OEM has 53.3% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 555 OEM and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 555 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 555 OEM
GeForce GTX 555 OEM
AMD Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 38 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 555 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 555 OEM or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.