Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GTX 560

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 with Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
7.10
+338%

GTX 560 outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 338% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking517911
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.64no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Terascale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF114no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$76 (0.4x MSRP)$90

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336736
Core clock speed810 MHz655 / 600 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature99 °Cno data
Texture fill rate45.36no data
Floating-point performance1,088.6 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560 and Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length8.25" (21 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMIno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/Ano data
CUDA+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p100−110
+335%
23
−335%
Full HD80−85
+321%
19
−321%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Hitman 3 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+333%
14−16
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Hitman 3 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+333%
14−16
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+333%
14−16
−333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+317%
12−14
−317%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Hitman 3 30−33
+329%
7−8
−329%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%

This is how GTX 560 and HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 is 335% faster in 900p
  • GTX 560 is 321% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.10 1.62
Recency 17 May 2011 15 May 2012

The GeForce GTX 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560
AMD Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1002 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7520G HD 7670M Dual Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.