Mobility Radeon HD 4670 vs GeForce GTX 560

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 560
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
7.09
+481%

GeForce GTX 560 outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 4670 by a whopping 481% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking5161011
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.640.10
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Terascale 1 (2008−2010)
GPU code nameGF114M96-XT
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 May 2011 (13 years ago)9 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$76 (0.4x MSRP)$143

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 560 has 1540% better value for money than ATI Mobility HD 4670.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores336320
Core clock speed810 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature99 °Cno data
Texture fill rate45.3621.60
Floating-point performance1,088.6 gflops432.0 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 560 and Mobility Radeon HD 4670 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length8.25" (21 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsTwo 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed4000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVI, Mini HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
HDCP+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+no data
3D Gaming+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.09 1.22
Recency 17 May 2011 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

The GeForce GTX 560 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4670 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 is a desktop card while Mobility Radeon HD 4670 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
GeForce GTX 560
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Mobility Radeon HD 4670

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 999 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 12 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.