UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Place in the ranking	520	544
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.84	no data
Power efficiency	3.23	no data
Architecture	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code name	GF114	Alder Lake Xe
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 January 2011 (13 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	64
Core clock speed	823 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1400 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	52.67	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.263 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	64	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Length	229 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1002 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	128.3 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	no data
HDMI	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	2.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.96
+10.2%

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 7.22

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 560 Ti 4013

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 5039
+25.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 560 Ti 15494

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 18749
+21%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 560 Ti 3470

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 3895
+12.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	63 +14.5%	55−60 −14.5%
Full HD	63 +200%	21 −200%
1440p	12−14 +9.1%	11 −9.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.95	no data
1440p	20.75	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −12.5%	18 +12.5%
Elden Ring	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +129%	7 −129%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +0%	32 +0%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +10.5%	19 −10.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +10%	20−22 −10%
Valorant	27−30 +8%	25 −8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +100%	8 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +167%	6 −167%
Dota 2	27−30 +7.7%	26 −7.7%
Elden Ring	21−24 +37.5%	16 −37.5%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +25.9%	27 −25.9%
Fortnite	45−50 +9.3%	40−45 −9.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +23.1%	26 −23.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +133%	12 −133%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +61.5%	13 −61.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +8.6%	55−60 −8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +10%	20−22 −10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +9.1%	21−24 −9.1%
Valorant	27−30 +50%	18 −50%
World of Tanks	120−130 +8.1%	110−120 −8.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +13%	21−24 −13%
Counter-Strike 2	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Dota 2	27−30 −75%	49 +75%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +6.3%	30−35 −6.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +60%	20 −60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	60−65 +8.6%	55−60 −8.6%
Valorant	27−30 +22.7%	22 −22.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	9−10 +50%	6 −50%
Elden Ring	10−11 +11.1%	9−10 −11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 +50%	6 −50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 +2.6%	35−40 −2.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
World of Tanks	55−60 +9.6%	50−55 −9.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +7.7%	12−14 −7.7%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +20%	5−6 −20%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 +18.2%	10−12 −18.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Valorant	20−22 +11.1%	18−20 −11.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Elden Ring	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +9.5%	21−24 −9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +16.7%	6−7 −16.7%
Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	18−20 +5.6%	18−20 −5.6%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Fortnite	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +12.5%	8−9 −12.5%
Valorant	8−9 +14.3%	7−8 −14.3%

This is how GTX 560 Ti and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:

GTX 560 Ti is 15% faster in 900p
GTX 560 Ti is 200% faster in 1080p
GTX 560 Ti is 9% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 560 Ti is 167% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 75% faster.

All in all, in popular games: