Tesla K40m vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

Place in performance ranking	490	469
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.82	1.11
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GF114	GK110B
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	25 January 2011 (13 years ago)	22 November 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	$7,699
Current price	$130 (0.5x MSRP)	$744 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 560 Ti has 64% better value for money than Tesla K40m.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	2880
Core clock speed	822 MHz	745 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	876 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	245 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.67	210.2
Floating-point performance	1,263.4 gflops	4,291 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	229 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.3 GB/s	288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	2.1	3.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.88

Tesla K40m 8.50
+7.9%

Tesla K40m outperforms GeForce GTX 560 Ti by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560 Ti 3042

Tesla K40m 3281
+7.9%

Tesla K40m outperforms GeForce GTX 560 Ti by 8% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	63 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Full HD	59 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−20%

12−14
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −19%	24−27 +19%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Battlefield 5	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Hitman 3	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −19%	24−27 +19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −8.6%	35−40 +8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −16.7%	35−40 +16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −19%	24−27 +19%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −14.3%	16−18 +14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −11.1%	30−33 +11.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−22.2%

21−24
+22.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Hitman 3	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14

−8.3%

12−14
+8.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Hitman 3	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	1−2
Far Cry 5	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

−14.3%

8−9
+14.3%

This is how GTX 560 Ti and Tesla K40m compete in popular games:

Tesla K40m is 3% faster in 900p
Tesla K40m is 2% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	7.88	8.50
Recency	25 January 2011	22 November 2013
Cost	$249	$7699
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	245 Watt