GeForce4 Ti 4200 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti and GeForce4 Ti 4200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 560 Ti
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
6.84
+68300%

GTX 560 Ti outperforms GeForce4 Ti 4200 by a whopping 68300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5321515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.59no data
Power efficiency3.18no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kelvin (2001−2003)
GPU code nameGF114NV25 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 January 2011 (14 years ago)6 February 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed823 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million63 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Texture fill rate52.672.000
Floating-point processing power1.263 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs648

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 4x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.3 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)8.1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 560 Ti 6.84
+68300%
GeForce4 Ti 4200 0.01

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 560 Ti 3055
+61000%
GeForce4 Ti 4200 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p63-0−1
Full HD65-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.83no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Atomic Heart 18−20 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
Valorant 75−80 0−1
Atomic Heart 18−20 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 55−60 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 21−24 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 0−1
Valorant 75−80 0−1
Battlefield 5 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 55−60 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22 0−1
Valorant 75−80 0−1
Fortnite 45−50 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 10−11 0−1
Metro Exodus 7−8 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 0−1
Valorant 80−85 0−1
Battlefield 5 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Far Cry 5 14−16 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Fortnite 14−16 0−1
Atomic Heart 6−7 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 0−1
Valorant 35−40 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 27−30 0−1
Far Cry 5 8−9 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 0−1
Fortnite 7−8 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.84 0.01
Recency 25 January 2011 6 February 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 150 nm

GTX 560 Ti has a 68300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4200 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4200
GeForce4 Ti 4200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9
848 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
41 vote

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti or GeForce4 Ti 4200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.