GeForce GT 730 vs GTX 560 Ti

Place in performance ranking	483	819
Place by popularity	not in top-100	17
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.77	0.19
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GF114	GF108
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 January 2011 (13 years ago)	18 June 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$249	$59.99
Current price	$130 (0.5x MSRP)	$77 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 560 Ti has 832% better value for money than GT 730.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	96
Core clock speed	822 MHz	700 MHz
Number of transistors	1,950 million	585 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	170 Watt	49 Watt
Texture fill rate	52.67	11.2 GT/s
Floating-point performance	1,263.4 gflops	268.8 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	229 mm	145 mm
Width	2-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	2x 6-pin	None

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2004 MHz	1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	128.3 GB/s	25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	2.1	2.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 560 Ti 7.85
+265%

GT 730 2.15

GTX 560 Ti outperforms GT 730 by 265% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 560 Ti 3038
+264%

GT 730 834

GTX 560 Ti outperforms GT 730 by 264% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 560 Ti 3470
+197%

GT 730 1170

GTX 560 Ti outperforms GT 730 by 197% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 560 Ti 11002
+278%

GT 730 2914

GTX 560 Ti outperforms GT 730 by 278% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 560 Ti 38
+280%

GT 730 10

GTX 560 Ti outperforms GT 730 by 280% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	63 +294%	16−18 −294%
Full HD	65 +306%	16−18 −306%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

+300%

3−4
−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Hitman 3	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
Hitman 3	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +325%	4−5 −325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +280%	5−6 −280%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 +300%	5−6 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +286%	7−8 −286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Hitman 3	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +367%	3−4 −367%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Battlefield 5	10−11 +400%	2−3 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−12 +267%	3−4 −267%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +333%	3−4 −333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Hitman 3	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Metro Exodus	2−3	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Battlefield 5	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +350%	2−3 −350%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1