UHD Graphics 730 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and UHD Graphics 730, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GTX 560 Ti 448 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 551 | 729 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.52 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 2.71 | 19.10 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | Generation 12.2 (2022−2023) |
| GPU code name | GF110 | Raptor Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 November 2011 (13 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $289 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 448 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1550 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,000 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 40.99 | 18.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.312 TFLOPS | 0.5952 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 6 |
| TMUs | 56 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1280 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 320 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 950 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 152.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Motherboard Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 2.0 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 7.89 | 3.97 |
| Recency | 29 November 2011 | 3 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 210 Watt | 15 Watt |
GTX 560 Ti 448 has a 98.7% higher aggregate performance score.
UHD Graphics 730, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 1300% lower power consumption.
The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
