Radeon RX 6800M vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with Radeon RX 6800M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011, $289
1280 MB GDDR5, 210 Watt
7.60

6800M outperforms 560 Ti 448 by a whopping 316% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
RX 6800M RX 6800M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking575195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.50no data
Power efficiency2.7916.81
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF110Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 November 2011 (14 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4482560
Core clock speed732 MHz2116 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2390 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt145 Watt
Texture fill rate40.99382.4
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS12.24 TFLOPS
ROPs4064
TMUs56160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache896 KB512 KB
L2 Cache640 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB12 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 560 Ti 448 7.60
RX 6800M 31.65
+316%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 560 Ti 448 4210
RX 6800M 34199
+712%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−346%
107
+346%
1440p16−18
−344%
71
+344%
4K10−12
−330%
43
+330%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.04no data
1440p18.06no data
4K28.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 123
+0%
123
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 128
+0%
128
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+0%
110
+0%
Far Cry 5 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 131
+0%
131
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+0%
102
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 112
+0%
112
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+0%
188
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+0%
84
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 51
+0%
51
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 95
+0%
95
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how GTX 560 Ti 448 and RX 6800M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800M is 346% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800M is 344% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800M is 330% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.60 31.65
Recency 29 November 2011 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 145 Watt

RX 6800M has a 316% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 860% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 471% more advanced lithography process, and 45% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6800M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 260X Radeon R7 260X
RX 6800M Radeon RX 6800M
vs
RTX 2070 Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 360 Radeon R7 360
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
GeForce 930A 930A
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
ATI HD 4850 X2 HD 4850 X2
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
ATI HD 3830 HD 3830
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
ATI X850 XT Platinum X850 XT Platinum
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
6800 GS 6800 GS
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
HD 7410M HD 7410M
510 OEM 510 OEM
vs
8400 GS Rev. 3 8400 GS Rev. 3
510 OEM 510 OEM
vs
8400 GS Rev. 2 8400 GS Rev. 2
510 OEM 510 OEM
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled
510 OEM 510 OEM
vs
RX Vega XTX RX Vega XTX

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 351 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or Radeon RX 6800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.