Radeon RX 460 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
455 OEM 460 460 1024SP 470 470D 480

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 and Radeon RX 460, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011
1280 MB GDDR5, 210 Watt
7.58

RX 460 outperforms GTX 560 Ti 448 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
RX 460 RX 460

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking557475
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.471.12
Power efficiency2.759.93
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGF110Baffin
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 November 2011 (13 years ago)8 August 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 $86

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 560 Ti 448 has 31% better value for money than RX 460.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448896
Core clock speed732 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate40.9967.20
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs4016
TMUs5656

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mm170 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB2 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 560 Ti 448 7.58
RX 460 9.77
+28.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 560 Ti 448 4210
RX 460 5701
+35.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD30−35
−36.7%
41
+36.7%
1440p35−40
−42.9%
50
+42.9%
4K14−16
−42.9%
20
+42.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.63
−359%
2.10
+359%
1440p8.26
−380%
1.72
+380%
4K20.64
−380%
4.30
+380%
  • RX 460 has 359% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 460 has 380% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 460 has 380% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
God of War 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Fortnite 116
+0%
116
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 57
+0%
57
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
God of War 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
God of War 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+0%
35
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Dota 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+0%
41
+0%
God of War 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20
+0%
20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
+0%
23
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 31
+0%
31
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
God of War 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+0%
12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 11
+0%
11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
God of War 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how GTX 560 Ti 448 and RX 460 compete in popular games:

  • RX 460 is 37% faster in 1080p
  • RX 460 is 43% faster in 1440p
  • RX 460 is 43% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.58 9.77
Recency 29 November 2011 8 August 2016
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 75 Watt

RX 460 has a 28.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 60% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 180% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 460 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
AMD Radeon RX 460
Radeon RX 460
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 260X Radeon R7 260X
RX 460 Radeon RX 460
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
GTX 470 GeForce GTX 470
7050 + nForce 630a 7050 + nForce 630a
vs
GT 610 GT 610
ION ION
vs
GT 610 GT 610
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
vs
GT 610 GT 610
605 OEM 605 OEM
vs
GT 610 PCI GT 610 PCI
RTX 2050 Mobile 2050 Mobile
vs
GTX 560 OEM 560 OEM
HD 6370D IGP HD 6370D IGP
vs
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
GeForce MX570 MX570
vs
GTX 560 GTX 560
GMA X4500 GMA X4500
vs
GT 530 OEM GT 530 OEM
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 710
vs
GT 520 GT 520

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1119 votes

Rate Radeon RX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or Radeon RX 460, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.