ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
560 OEM 560 Ti 448 570 570 Rev. 2 580 580 Rev. 2 590
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
550v 560v 565v 4650 4670 4670 Mac Edition 5165

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 with Mobility Radeon HD 4650, including specs and performance data.

GTX 560 Ti 448
2011, $289
1280 MB GDDR5, 210 Watt
7.55
+695%

560 Ti 448 outperforms Mobility HD 4650 by a whopping 695% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 560 Ti 448 GTX 560 Ti 448
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Mobility HD 4650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5711161
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.48no data
Power efficiency2.772.09
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGF110M96
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 November 2011 (13 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$289 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448320
Core clock speed732 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,000 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate40.9916.00
Floating-point processing power1.312 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs408
TMUs5632
L1 Cache896 KB64 KB
L2 Cache640 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1280 MB512 MB
Memory bus width320 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed950 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth152.0 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMINo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+650%
16
−650%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how GTX 560 Ti 448 and ATI Mobility HD 4650 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 560 Ti 448 is 650% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 40 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.55 0.95
Recency 29 November 2011 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1280 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 560 Ti 448 has a 694.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 4650, on the other hand, has 500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 4650 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
GTX 470 GeForce GTX 470
ATI Mobility HD 4650 Mobility Radeon HD 4650
vs
GT 640M Mac Edition GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition
GTX 560 Ti 448 GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
R7 360 Radeon R7 360
GT 610 PCIe x1 NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 PCIe x1
vs
ATI X700 SE Radeon X700 SE
GT 620 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
vs
ATI All-In-Wonder X600 All-In-Wonder X600
GT 620 OEM NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 OEM
vs
ATI FireGL V7350 FireGL V7350
GTX 560 SE NVIDIA GTX 560 SE
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 9Gbps 1060 6 GB 9Gbps
GTX 560 SE GeForce GTX 560 SE
vs
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
GTX 560 Ti 448 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
ATI Mobility HD 545v Radeon HD 545v
GTX 560 Ti 448 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4330 Radeon HD 4330
510 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
vs
GT 420 OEM GT 420 OEM
510 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
vs
R7 M265DX R7 M265DX
510 OEM NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
vs
Radeon 625 Radeon 625

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 94 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 or Mobility Radeon HD 4650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.